How is fault proven in a slip-and-fall accident case?

A slip-and-fall accident can occur in many different ways. Sometimes, it is simply an accident, and no one is really at fault. Other times, dangerous or negligent property conditions can lead to such a fall. Examples include wet floors, uneven steps, torn or frayed carpeting and any number of other hazardous conditions. Potential injuries from such accidents may range from bruises and scrapes to broken bones and serious head trauma.

Many victims of slip-and-fall accidents in Oklahoma want to hold proprietors responsible for any hazardous conditions that may have contributed to the accident. Doing so is not only possible, but is widely encouraged so that the property owner will not allow another person to become injured. However, to prove fault, certain elements must have existed at the time of the accident.

There are three situations upon which a personal injury lawsuit involving premises liability can be based. The first situation is when the proprietors of the property should have realized a danger existed and taken steps to remedy it as any reasonable person would. Secondly, if it can be shown that the proprietors did know about the hazard and did nothing to remedy it, grounds for a lawsuit likely exist. Finally, the third situation is if the proprietors did something to actually cause the conditions that led to the accident.

This information should serve only as a guideline for those who are concerned that their accident occurred due to a property owner or staff member's negligence. The best way to find out if you have a solid case is to seek assistance from someone who understands the premises liability laws in Oklahoma.

Source: FindLaw, "Proving Fault in Slip and Fall Accidents," accessed July 21, 2016

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information